Hanging Out with Bruce Reyes-Chow

This weekend some of my fellow seminarians and church friends had the joy of visiting with Bruce Reyes-Chow, one of the candidates for Moderator of the PC(USA) General Assembly.  Both on Saturday afternoon, at a casual meet-and-greet time at The Vault, and last night after worship at The Open Door, Bruce was intentional about listening to all of us – wanting to hear our stories and what our dreams are for the future of the denomination.  As someone who favors a grassroots understanding of ministry, he was eager to listen to the church members, seminarians, and friends who visited with him.   A good moderator is a good listener.  Of course we also got to hear Bruce’s take on everything from the renumbering of G-6.0106b in the FOG report to the uniqueness of this year’s assembly.  I’m not going to summarize everything here, but I will say that I wish him the best in his run for Moderator and pray that God will bless and use him for the good of the Church.  I don’t agree with Bruce about everything – for instance, this issue of homosexuality – but there are a few reasons why I believe the denomination would fair well to have him as Moderator of the GA. 

First, he knows that the PC(USA) needs to wake up to the reality of the cultural changes which are currently taking place in North America.  His candidacy has made impressive use of blogs and Facebook to get the word out among younger Presbyterians, and this has changed the way other moderators are approaching the race.  Second, in view of those cultural shifts he believes the denomination needs to learn from more creative and missional forms of ministry.  As the pastor of a church-plant, Bruce is actively working in the creative, growing edge of the church.   For the PC(USA) to experience missional renewal, the voices of people who are working outside of the traditional structures of the denomination need to be heard at all levels of the church.  This, more than anything, is why I like Bruce – the church needs to hear the voices of young creative leaders like himself as it looks further into the 21st century.  I believe Bruce has the potential to bring people and churches from the fringes of the denomination (like Open Door) into conversation and community with the existing power structures.  We need this.   

At the end of our time last night, several of us gathered around Bruce and prayed for him.  As we prayed that the Spirit would fill him, guide him, and use him for God’s glory in the reshaping of the PC(USA).  I pray specifically that the commissioners and advisory delegates will be sensitive to the Holy Spirit as they discern which candidate to choose.    As we count down the weeks until GA, I wish Bruce the best and look foward to seeing what happens in San Jose! 


Bruce Reyes-Chow for Moderator

  1. mikegehrling said:

    I’m glad there’s someone running who’s concerned for missional renewal in the church. That being said I think it’s lamentable that we (by ‘we’ I mean evangelicals in the PC(USA) with a concern for the future of the church’s mission) would have to settle for someone who doesn’t uphold biblical standards on sexuality. Is it really too much to ask to find a moderator who is missionally minded AND has a high view of Scripture?

    (Consequently, I was just checking out Bill Teng’s website: http://www.billteng.com and liked what I read.)

  2. Mike – Thanks for the feedback. I have found that both traditional conservatives as well as progressives are not all that happy with me as one that does not fit traditional bounds. Conservative on some things, progressive on others. And while I hardly want to be “settled” for as a moderator, I think it is good to feel some of that tension to help us discern if/how we can be in community. I think thou hast inspired a blog post as well! Take care – Bruce

  3. mikegehrling said:

    Hahaha. Well Bruce, now I’m really really hoping that you’re elected moderator just so I can say, “I inspired the moderator to write a blog post.” 🙂

    In all serious, I look forward to reading what you have to say. I’ve been thinking more about this issue and I’m probably going to do the same on my blog.

    On a more personal note, I generally don’t like to call myself “conservative” (or “liberal” or “moderate”). I think all of those words are a bit too polarizing and carry heavy political connotations. I personally prefer to be called “evangelical” because I seek to work all of my theological positions out of a central concern for the gospel of Jesus Christ.

    grace and peace in Christ

  4. Mike – Let me know when/if you blog something and I hear ya about the the labels. Just such a time-saver 😉 Chris, sorry for taking over the post.

  5. I think too much is being made of Bruce’s tech-savy and the fact that he did not wear a tie at GA. Vision is not limited by age or techiness…..Ok, he cares about the grass-roots and missional church…yet, the importance of the scriptures in understanding the world is most important. It seems to me that he views the scriptures through the world’s lens and not the other way around. This fatal flaw means that rather than beginning with God as the source of truth he may be beginning with man and human experience as the source. BTW….I am over 50, blog and wear jeans and flip flops to church….what does that say about me??

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: